Date received: 10/02/ Drug Free Australia, National Office: 1 Collingrove Avenue, Broadview, SA ; Executive Officer: Josephine Baxter. IN WHICH world does Greens leader Senator Richard Di Natale live His plan to That is what Drug Free Australia's Jo Baxter warns. To date Cr Quirk has rejected a suggestion from Mr Harding for a series of three town. Josephine Baxter, Executive Officer, Drug Free. Australia. • Alan Clough, School of Public Health, . that the material reflects the latest and most up-to-date.101 Free Christian Dating Site (OFFICIAL)
I should stress this is not a pro-drug nor pro-cannabis post. If anything it is a pro-evidence post and I would hope readers can reflect upon the value of evidence in a human rights manner, much as we do in a consumer rights manner. Rather, one is bound to reject subjective and predisposed constraints in favour of evidence.
Cannabis is not a hard drug. Cannabis is not a soft drug. Cannabis is a drug, and as such deserves the respect that science and apolitical critiques can bring. The nonsense above was originally written in and has been continually polished and rephrased over the years. Subtitled A research paper on the effects of acute and chronic cannabis use, it is in fact a biased selection of literature.
Not research, nor literature review. This area is fraught with notable disrespect for variables involved. If so, what strains grown under what conditions provide conclusive answers? If so, what of the famed sinsemilla grown for decades? Readers were to be very afraid as the equally preposterous and unsourced joint potency from the s was 0. In THC content of cannabis in Australia: The major obstacle to testing these claims is that the THC content of cannabis products has not been systematically tested by any Australian police force over the period in which average THC content has been claimed to have increased.
Well, no, it appears to be fiction. So why are DFA misleading the public this way? A primary area of community confusion and angst is the poorly reported association between psychosis and cannabis. It terrifies parents and this fear can persist in the absence of evidence.
I must stress that negative experiences associated with ingesting THC can certainly be exacerbated by ingesting a volume of cannabis that contains more THC than a user is accustomed to. I would add however, that user titration gives control to the cannabis user over the amount ingested. In this light a number of claims pushed by DFA demand criticism.
Again, as we shall see below, this is not backed by evidence. What is drug-induced psychosis in this context? Sure, hydroponic production has provided the equivalent of sinsemilla-type product to users. Hydroponics ensures rapid maturation and more flowering head. Per plant there is more THC rich matter. But that matter is not notably more THC potent. I hate to excessively mull this over, so to speak, but once again prohibition has placed better drugs for the same price into the hands of Aussie kids.
Drug Free Australia | Losing In The Lucky Country
They are challenging figures from to Returning again to Hall and Swiftwe see on page 8: Yet head seems to be the main product. The media preoccupation with the THC content of cannabis has distracted attention from other causes for concern about changing patterns of cannabis use among Australian adolescents and young adults. These patterns of cannabis use, which may encourage younger users to use more potent forms of cannabis, may also increase their chances of developing problems as a consequence of their cannabis use.
This is of course, exactly the point. By pursuing sensationalism, co-morbid health problems and negative lifestyle changes are frequently ignored. That this has been willingly and eagerly encouraged by groups such as DFA as part of their agenda to encourage blanket illicit drug zero tolerance and the public health damage this bringsis deeply concerning.
Such tactics are typical of the evangelical crusade waged by this conservative Christian group. You can read more here about Drug Free Australia and their campaign against evidence.
Whilst it is unacceptable for young Aussies to be under the impression cannabis is entirely safe, we can see without much effort how a spike in reports on cannabis and psychological harm has been exploited. In fact this point is ripe for confusion about the role of evidence, its import and what might be termed insults from intuitive reasoning.
Cannabis use as a recreational drug is defended at times with argument from antiquity. Like many alternatives to medicine such as TCMcannabis is also subject to further defence with argument from antiquity.
According to The Mayo Clinic medicinal use can be traced back 5, years. Would they be permitted without even a qualifying period and evaluation? What would happen with designer drugs? If so, how would limits be enforced e. Would the private sector or the public sector or both be involved?
How would price, purity and potency levels be established and regulated? Would advertising be permitted? If so, what drug would be advertised and by whom? Over the counter, through the mail, vending machines or restaurants? Would the sale of such drugs be limited to dependent abusers? If so, how many and from which cities or countries? What about experimenters and those not yet granted dependent status?
Would there be restrictions on use because of impairment of function e. Evans, WFADp. During the last decade, coca cultivation has decreased by one third and the world output of cocaine, and amphetamine type stimulants have stabilised; Cannabis output has declined since It fails to include relevant information from countries that have tried a more liberal approach and have returned to focus on harm prevention.
Sweden continues to enjoy the lowest per capita illicit drug use rates in the world. It is no coincidence that they have a correlation of low drug use and significantly lower child abuse rates than their counterparts in Europe. The Netherlands, who has had a history of liberal drug policy, is now doing an about face. Even though possession and sale of marijuana are not technically legal, the coffee shops were permitted to sell marijuana under certain restrictions to include a limit of no more than 5 grams sold to a person at any one time.
The Dutch saw the use of marijuana among young people more than double. The use of ecstasy and cocaine by year olds rose significantly. After marijuana use became normalised, consumption among 18 to 20 year-olds nearly tripled - from 15 per cent to 44 per cent. It has since declined due to an anti-marijuana program by the government. Inthe government of the Netherlands formally announced its mistake.
Portugal — recently, heralded by some who would legalise drugs in Australia, as a model to be emulated, is now winding back its Harm Reduction strategies, as the results have not been what they had anticipated. In the United States the Obama Administration has categorically stated that it will not legalise illicit drugs and is actively cracking down on those states where medical marijuana has been sanctioned.
Though the authors of Australia 21 may once have played a role in policy and practice in the illicit drug arena, they now appear to be extraordinarily out-of-touch with current scientific evidence, as well as the reality of what the vast majority of people in Australia really want — a healthy future for our kids! This is NOT the answer! Saturday, 25 February In Australia this movement is gaining momentum, because of a handful of people who have either been misinformed, or worse, have vested interests.
Over the past year or so, there has been an increase in drive-by shootings and gang violence in our cities. What they fail acknowledge is that: